Analyzing the length of judicial proceedings: The CEPEJ adopted the Time Management Checklist

During its 40th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 15-16 June 2023), the  Council of Europe European Commission for the efficiency of justice (CEPEJ) adopted the revised Time Management Checklist and its Explanatory Note. 

The first version was adopted by the CEPEJ in 2005 and was very successful since then within the European judicial systems. The Checklist is a diagnostic and management tool to help the judiciary to collect information on and analyse relevant aspects of the duration of judicial proceedings. It provides an initial set of questions with purpose of helping in collecting appropriate information about the cases and to analyse relevant aspects of duration of court proceedings. The questions are structured around six indicators pertaining to the establishment and monitoring of duration of proceedings, timeframes, case weighting and use of information and communication technologies in courts. Based on the collected information and outcomes of the analysis, its purpose is to support courts and judicial authorities to take measure to resolve cases within a reasonable time, set feasible timeframes and make the proceedings more transparent and predictable to court users. (source: coe.int/ photo: freepik.com)

Documents adopted:

Time Management Checklist

Explanatory Note for the Time Management Checklist


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Greek Administrative Court rules state liable for Covid-19 vaccine side effects due to "excessive sacrifice"

THE CONCEPT OF WORKER (IN ARTICLE 45 TFEU)

Excessive formalism as a restriction on the right of access to justice

ECtHR Judgement against Greece: Disclosure of the identities and medical data of prostitutes diagnosed with HIV was a breach of their right to private life

Justice Minister’s statements violated presumption of innocence (ECtHR)

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Amendment of Articles of Association in Cyprus: Between Corporate Freedom and Abuse of Right – A Comparison with the Corresponding Regulation in Germany