Prohibiting contact between children and their mother in custody and contact rights case was unjustified (ECtHR)

The case of X and Others v. Slovenia (application nos. 27746/22 and 28291/22) concerned custody decisions and contact rights following the separation of X from her children’s father in 2018. It also concerned the reassignment of X’s court case to a particular judge. 

In Chamber's judgment in the case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights, as regards X’s right to a tribunal established by law, and violations of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) with respect both to: 

- the applicant children, as regards the order to remove them from X’s (their mother’s) care in March 2020, their not being represented in the contact and custody proceedings, and their not being allowed contact with their mother; 

- X, for not being allowed contact with her children. 

The Court found in particular that the President of the District Court, in assigning the applicants’ cases to a particular judge, contrary to objective pre-established criteria, had defied the clear purpose of the law – namely, to ensure randomness in the assignments of cases. 

Read as well: Cyprus Family Law: Spouse's claim for contribution in post-marital acquisitions

The regulation of property issues between spouses after divorce or separation is one of the main problems and is most commonly related with the issue of the contribution of one spouse to the increase in the other’s property. Article by Giorgos Kazoleas, Lawyer in Cyprus

Click here


It also considered that two interim orders and a judgment prohibiting contact between the children and their mother had not been justified and that the removal of the children from X had not been supported by relevant and sufficient reasons. 

Moreover, the national courts’ failure to ensure proper representation of the children’s interests during the contact and custody proceedings had amounted, in itself, to a breach of the children’s right to respect for their family life.

The Court held that Slovenia was to pay the mother 7,000 euros (EUR) and the children jointly EUR 20,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and EUR 7,000 to all the applicants jointly with an additional EUR 2,500 to the mother in respect of costs and expenses. (echr.coe.int/photo:freepik.com)

Read the decision here

Comments

  1. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that it was wrong to block contact between a mother and her children without strong reasons. It also said the court process was unfair and didn’t help with child support and the properly rights.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Annual Report on the execution of the European Court's judgments and decisions

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Fully-funded PhD position in AI, Law and Public Power

Dismissal of a public-sector employee for having “Liked” Facebook posts: Violation of her right to freedom of expression

Following the tragic death of lawyer Ebru Timtik, the CCBE calls on the EU and Turkish authorities to take urgent measures to prevent the death of lawyer Aytaç Ünsal

Harassment During Job Interviews Under Cyprus Law

The Delivery Delay Clause in Residential Construction Contracts: Consumer Protection in Cyprus and Europe