Significant Electoral Reform in Cyprus: Voting Age Lowered to 17

Nicosia, Cyprus – May 30, 2025 – A pivotal amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, specifically concerning the right to vote, has been officially published. Article 63 of the Constitution, which pertains to the right to elect, has been revised by virtue of "The Twentieth Amendment of the Constitution Law of 2025", published in the Official Gazette of the Republic on May 30, 2025.

The amended Article 63 now reads as follows:

"Subject to the provisions of the second paragraph of this Article, every citizen of the Republic who has completed their seventeenth year of age and possesses the residency qualifications prescribed by the electoral law shall be entitled to be registered as an elector either in the Greek or in the Turkish electoral roll. However, members of the Greek community shall be registered only in the Greek electoral roll, and members of the Turkish community only in the Turkish electoral roll.

No one shall be entitled to be registered as an elector unless they possess the qualifications required for registration by the electoral law."

This transformative amending law is slated to come into force on July 1, 2027.

The preamble to the amending law elucidates the compelling reasons for this significant change:
  • WHEREAS, Article 63.1 of the Constitution currently sets the minimum voting age at eighteen years;
  • AND WHEREAS, the continuous reinforcement of democratic legitimacy and the improvement of the functioning of the political system necessitate the broadening of the electoral base, i.e., the electorate, by encouraging citizens' participation in electoral processes for the election of state organs;
  • AND WHEREAS, for the purposes of achieving the objective of strengthening democratic functioning in the Republic, it is deemed necessary that the right to elect for the purpose of electing members of the House of Representatives be extended, so that all citizens who have completed their seventeenth year of age shall have the right to elect;
  • AND WHEREAS, Article 63 is not included among the fundamental articles of the Constitution, which cannot be amended in any way;
  • AND WHEREAS, due to the ongoing Turkish occupation and the exceptional circumstances prevailing in Cyprus as a result thereof, Turkish Cypriots do not participate in the functioning of the House of Representatives;
  • AND WHEREAS, the doctrine of necessity justifies the maintenance of the power of the House of Representatives to amend non-fundamental provisions of the Constitution, and in this specific case, taking into account the foregoing, also justifies the achievement of the intended objective, namely the more effective functioning of the democratic political system through the extension of the right to elect.

This amendment signifies a progressive step towards enhancing youth engagement in the democratic process of Cyprus, recognizing their vital role in shaping the future of the Republic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Image
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed  the inquiry  and upheld...
Read more

Access to documents: the Commission decision refusing a journalist of The New York Times access to the text messages exchanged between President von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer is annulled (CJEU)

Image
In its Judgment dated 14/5/2025 in Case T-36/23 (Stevi and The New York Times v Commission), the General Court ruled that the Commission decision refusing a journalist of The New York Times access to the text messages exchanged between President von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer is annulled. By an application based on the Access to Documents Regulation, [1], Matina Stevi, a journalist working for the daily newspaper The New York Times, requested the European Commission to provide access to all text messages exchanged between President Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla, the chief executive officer of Pfizer, between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022.  The Commission rejected that application on the ground that it did not hold the documents covered by it. Ms Stevi and The New York Times requested the General Court of the European Union to annul the Commission’s decision.  In its judgment, the General Court upholds the action and annuls the Commission’s decision. The Court re...
Read more

New President of the European Court of Human Rights

Image
The European Court of Human Rights has elected on 28.4.2025 Mattias Guyomar, Judge elected in respect of France, as its new President.  Mattias Guyomar succeeds Marko Bošnjak, Judge elected in respect of Slovenia. He will take up office on 30 May 2025. Read his bio here Furthermore, the Judge elected in respect of Armenia, Vahe Grigoryan, was formally sworn in in the Court's Main Hearing Room on 28.4.2025. Read as well:  Interventions in Justice System and the role of Artificial Intelligence / article by Giorgos Kazoleas, Lawyer in Cyprus
Read more

An overview of the regulatory framework on Gambling Services in the European Union

Image
written by Efi Thoma * The European Union (EU) does not have a harmonized, single regulatory framework for betting companies. Instead, the regulation of gambling services, including betting, remains largely within the competence of individual Member States.  This results in a diverse and often fragmented legal framework across the EU. While the EU facilitates some level of cooperation and sets overarching principles, the specifics of licensing, operational requirements, and consumer protection measures vary significantly from country to country. Despite the lack of a unified framework, several key principles and EU-level instruments influence the national regulations of betting companies. More specifically, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) guarantees the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services within the EU. These fundamental freedoms mean that Member States cannot unjustifiably restrict betting companies legally established in ano...
Read more

Imposition of a fine on a bank in Greece for an incident of personal data breach

Image
The Greek Data Protection Supervisory Authority imposed on a Bank, as Data Controller, an administrative fine of EUR 100,000 for violating the principles of accuracy, integrity, and confidentiality of data, and the principles of data protection by design and by default, in conjunction with Articles 32, 33, and 34 of the GDPR, as well as an administrative fine of EUR 20,000 for violating the complainants' right of access. Complaints were submitted to the Supervisory Authority of Greece against the National Bank of Greece for the incorrect linking of a complainant's bank account with the mobile phone number of another complainant in the “i-bank Pay application”, which resulted in money transfers, via “IRIS online payments service”, which were made to the first complainant's account instead of the second's.  In the context of the administrative audit conducted by the Authority, the Bank eventually identified that the issue was due to incorrect configuration during the ...
Read more