E-Trials & Virtual Courtrooms: A possible solution to Court Lockdown
Editor: Anastasios Tsanakas, Lawyer
Numerous Jurisdictions, including the Republic
of Cyprus have decided as part of their measures for the prevention of Covid 19
transmission, the suspension of Court operations. Nevertheless and for obvious
reasons there can be no universal lockdown to the administration of justice.
A possible solution to the imposed restrictions
that inhibit justice accessibility is the development and establishment of
In the UK, an entire trial is being conducted
over Skype in a legal first that lawyers say could be a model way to ensure
court business continues during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Judge, is asked to decide whether it is in
the best interests of a 70 years old man that suffered a major stroke in 2016
to have the clinically assisted nutrition and hydration he receives through a
tube, withdrawn. The patient’s daughter and GP disagree over his treatment and
the local clinical commissioning group has asked the court to determine the
course to take.
In the three-day hearing, the judge, lawyers,
11 witnesses, three experts and two journalists, joined the hearing online
through Skype for Business, which enables everyone to see and hear those taking
part, as well as allowing the hearing to be recorded. The judge decided that
the hearing should be conducted over Skype to enable it to proceed without
risking the health of any of the participants, some of whom are in vulnerable
groups or live with people who are.
At the end of the first day, the barrister
representing the man’s GP, stated: ‘It was very effective, and allowed for full and
fair participation by all parties, using a laptop from their home or office’.
And continued: ‘It’s a necessary step – it’s important for the rule of law to ensure the
courts continue to function during this crisis.’ In similar terms
the barrister representing the clinical commissioning group stated: ‘It could be
used as a model to keep the system going, keep justice accessible and to
alleviate the anxiety of parties who otherwise might have to wait a long time
for hearings to take place in court.’
Sharing the above view, the lord chief justice
said that both the civil and family courts could move to telephone and video
hearings. ‘Any legal impediments will be dealt with.’ On the
criminal courts, he said: ‘Particular problems are likely to be encountered
in both the magistrates’ courts and the Crown courts, to which careful thought
is being given.’
The ”e-trial” proposal seems to gain momentum
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Another case, this time a multi-party commercial
trial relating to over $500m, could be heard entirely online and streamed on
YouTube as a result of the coronavirus lockdown.
The ‘substantial multi-party litigation’ was
originally scheduled to last seven days in London’s commercial court and
numerous factual and foreign law expert witnesses were due to be called before
travel restrictions were imposed.
The case will now be heard remotely, with
preparations being made to allow barristers, solicitors and the judge to work
from home. The judge gave short shrift to the argument that there would likely
be insurmountable logistical and technical difficulties and concluded that the
court must adopt an ‘optimistic, rather than a pessimistic, attitude’.
In addition, he acknowledged the possibility
that technical issues may arise, and that counsel may contract the virus and be
unable to appear for a number of days. Nonetheless, he said that a remote
hearing should be arranged, and that these risks should be addressed if and
when they materialise.
Parties have agreed to set up a ‘virtual court
room’ in the form of a video conference in which participants can see and hear
each other. They are also organising ‘virtual Post-it notes’ and ‘virtual
break-out rooms’ to allow legal teams and clients to discuss the trial as it
proceeds. The trial will be recorded and streamed, potentially via YouTube, so
that journalists and members of the public can follow the proceedings.
The above cases illustrate that the approach in
favor of “e-trials” seems to become widely accepted especially where there can
be no solid estimation on the duration of the suspension of Court operations.
Of course, several technical problems will be faced but advanced technological
applications and the unparallel need for administration of justice dictate that
every effective alternative solution must be seriously taken into account. (photo:pixabay)
By Giorgos Kazoleas, Lawyer A significant decision was issued by the CJEU  interpreting Articles 8 and 23 of Directive 2008/48/EC on consumer credit agreements and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC as regards the obligation of credit institutions to assess the creditworthiness of consumers before concluding the credit agreement. Article 8 of that directive, entitled ‘Obligation to assess the creditworthiness of the consumer’, provides: ‘ 1. Member States shall ensure that, before the conclusion of the credit agreement, the creditor assesses the consumer’s creditworthiness on the basis of sufficient information, where appropriate obtained from the consumer and, where necessary, on the basis of a consultation of the relevant database. Member States whose legislation requires creditors to assess the creditworthiness of consumers on the basis of a consultation of the relevant database may retain this requirement. 2. Member States shall ensure that, if the parties agree to c
The European Ombudsman inquiry into the Commission’s handling of a request for text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company is a wake-up call for all EU institutions about ensuring accountability in an era of instant messaging. One year after the initial request by a journalist, the Commission has still not clarified whether messages reported to concern major vaccine procurement deals exist and whether the public is entitled to see them. The Ombudsman had asked the Commission, in a finding of maladministration in January, to conduct a more thorough search for the text messages. The Commission’s recent response failed to say whether it had looked directly and correctly for the text messages and if not, why not. While the response recognised that work-related text messages can be EU documents, it reiterated that the Commission’s internal policy is, in effect, not to register text messages. The Ombudsman has closed the inquiry and upheld her find
European Central Bank (ECB) is looking for 15 highly talented recent graduates with a postgraduate degree, eventually a PhD, for the ECB’s Graduate Programme offering full time monthly net salary €4,611 plus benefits. General Information Type of contract: Two-year fixed-term contract starting on 1 September. It may be extended for one additional year upon successful completion of the programme. Who can apply? EU nationals Salary E/F (bracket 1 - step 1) full time monthly net salary: €4,611 plus benefits, for further information see here . Working time: Full time Place of work: Frankfurt am Main, Germany Closing date: 21.02.2024 ECB is looking for 15 highly talented recent graduates with a postgraduate degree, eventually a PhD, for the ECB’s Graduate Programme. You will have different ages, backgrounds and interests and will find intellectual challenges, varied opportunities and a people-centred working culture that gives you a voice and the chance to make an i
According to the Judgment of the Court of Justice (21.12.2023) in Case C-680/21 (Royal Antwerp Football Club), the rules of UEFA and the Belgian football association on ‘homegrown players’ could be contrary to EU law. A footballer and a Belgian club are challenging UEFA’s rules and those of the Belgian football association that require a minimum number of ‘home-grown players’ to be included in teams. The Court holds that that requirement could infringe both competition rules and the free movement of workers. However, the national court in charge of the case will have to verify whether or not that is the case. UEFA (Union of European Football Associations) requires football clubs to have a minimum number of ‘home-grown players’ in their teams. The Belgian football association (URBSFA) has adopted similar rules. In both cases, those rules define ‘home-grown players’ as players who are trained at national level, although UEFA’s rules also refer to players trained within a given club. A p
The case of O.G. and Others v. Greece (applications nos. 71555/12 and 48256/13) concerned the publication, by decision of the domestic authorities, of medical data concerning prostitutes who had been diagnosed as HIV-positive, and media coverage of them. It also concerned the circumstances in which they were required to undergo a blood test. In Chamber 's judgment(23.1.2024) in this case the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been two violations: -A violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, with regard to two applicants, on account of the blood tests they had been required to undertake. The Court considered that the blood samples imposed on two applicants had amounted to an interference with their private life and noted that this had not been in accordance with the law within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention, given that the provisions of domestic law in issue ought to have been f
According to the Judgment (14.12.2023) of the Court of Justice in Case C-340/21 (Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite), the fear of a possible misuse of personal data is capable, in itself, of constituting non-material damage. The Bulgarian National Revenue Agency (the NAP) is attached to the Bulgarian Minister for Finance. In particular, it is responsible for identifying, securing and recovering public debts. In this context, it is a personal data controller. On 15 July 2019, the media reported an intrusion into the NAP IT system, revealing that, following that cyberattack, personal data concerning millions of persons had been published on the internet. Many individuals brought legal actions against the NAP for compensation for non-material damage caused by the fear that their data might be misused. The Bulgarian Supreme Administrative Court refers several questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) .
In Chamber's judgment (14.12.2023) in the case of M.L. v. Poland (application no. 40119/21) concerning restrictions on abortion rights the European Court of Human Rights held, by five votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The applicant alleged in particular that she had been banned from having access to a legal abortion in the case of foetal abnormalities, following a 2020 Constitutional Court judgment. She had become pregnant and the foetus was diagnosed with trisomy 21. A scheduled hospital abortion had been cancelled when the legislative amendments resulting from the Constitutional Court ruling had come into force. Unable to have an abortion in Poland, she had ultimately had to travel to a private clinic abroad for the procedure. The Court found that the legislative amendments in question, which had forced her to travel abroad for an abortion at considerable expense