Refusal by the European Data Protection Board to grant full public access to draft versions of its statement on international agreements including transfers

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) refused to grant full public access to draft versions of its statement on international agreements including transfers. The European Ombudsman was not convinced by the reasons put forward by the EDPB to refuse access.

The complainant asked the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) for public access to draft versions of its statement on international agreements including data transfers. Following a separate Ombudsman inquiry, the EDPB identified additional documents as falling under the complainant's request, however it refused access to these documents. In doing so, it invoked an exception provided for in the EU legislation on public access to documents, arguing that disclosure could undermine the decision-making process.

Based on an inspection of the documents, the Ombudsman was not convinced by the reasons put forward by the EDPB to refuse access, and proposed as a solution that the EDPB reassess the request and reconsider its decision to deny access to those documents falling within the scope of the complaint. 

The EDPB did not follow this solution proposal and invoked an additional exception for refusing access. As a consequence, the Ombudsman made a finding maladministration, and recommended that the EDPB disclose the documents. 

Read the Recommendation here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Fully-funded PhD position in AI, Law and Public Power

The Delivery Delay Clause in Residential Construction Contracts: Consumer Protection in Cyprus and Europe

Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer has been opened for signature

Six new judges sworn in at the seat of the International Criminal Court

The principle of the most favourable rule as a basic principle of Greek Labour Law

A national competition authority can find, in the context of the examination of an abuse of a dominant position, that the GDPR has been infringed (ECJ)