Rule of Law: EU law does not require that professional associations of judges are granted the right to challenge decisions relating to the appointment of prosecutors

According to the Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-53/23 (Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România”(8.5.2024) EU law does not require that professional associations of judges are granted the right to challenge decisions relating to the appointment of prosecutors.

A Romanian professional association of judges challenges the appointment of certain prosecutors responsible for conducting investigations concerning cases of corruption in Romania.

They consider that the national legislation on which those appointments are based is incompatible with EU law and should not be applied.

Hearing that case, the Court of Appeal of Pitești (Romania) asks the Court of Justice whether the Romanian procedural rules, which, in essence, prevent associations of judges from bringing an action against the appointment of those prosecutors, since those rules make the admissibility of such an action subject to the existence of a legitimate private interest, comply with EU law.

The Romanian court also refers questions regarding the compatibility of that legislation with undertakings given by Romania to combat corruption and with EU law.

The Court of Justice holds that EU law does not preclude a national law which excludes, in practice, professional associations of judges from challenging the appointment of prosecutors competent to conduct criminal prosecutions against judges, by requiring the existence of a legitimate private interest to be established in order for such an action to be admissible. In principle, it is for the Member States to decide who may bring actions before the courts, without however undermining the right to effective judicial protection.

It is true that, in certain cases, EU law requires the Member States to permit representative associations to bring legal proceedings in order to protect the environment or combat discrimination.

However, there is no provision of EU law that requires the Member States to guarantee, generally, to professional associations of judges the right to contest any incompatibility with EU law of a national measure relating to the status of judges. In addition, the sole fact that national legislation does not permit those associations to bring such actions is insufficient to create, in the minds of individuals, legitimate doubts as to the independence of Romanian judges. (source: / photo:

Read the Decision here



George Kazoleas, Lawyer

Top Stories

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

Gigantic fine for unfair practices imposed on by the Competition Authority of Hungary

The name Pablo Escobar may not be registered as an EU trade mark

First judgment of the ECHR: Lawless v. Ireland

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): What and Why?

Airbnb is not required to hold an estate agent’s professional licence as it did not notify the Commission of that requirement in accordance with the Directive on electronic commerce

McDonald’s loses the EU trade mark Big Mac in respect of poultry products