A medicinal herbal tea classified as a traditional herbal medicinal product cannot, in principle, be marketed with the organic logo (ECJ)

The European Court of Justice in its Judgment in Case C-618/23 (Salus) ruled that a medicinal herbal tea classified as a traditional herbal medicinal product cannot, in principle, be marketed with the organic logo. 

The position may be otherwise where such an indication on the packaging has been approved by the competent authority on account of the beneficial effect of the organic production on the therapeutic characteristics of the medicinal product.

The German undertaking SALUS markets herbal medicinal products, including a sage medicinal herbal tea. The packaging of that medicinal product [1] bears the official organic production logo of the European Union. [2] 

SALUS intends to market other herbal teas with that logo. Twardy, a competing undertaking, is of the view that EU law precludes the use of the organic logo on the packaging of a medicinal product. It therefore asked the German courts to prohibit SALUS from marketing medicinal herbal teas the packaging of which bears indications relating to the organic origin of the plants from which they are made. The German court hearing the case submitted questions in that regard to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. 

The Court states that medicinal herbal teas such as those at issue, which must be regarded as traditional herbal medicinal products, cannot be marketed, in principle, with the organic logo. As medicinal products, they are covered exclusively by the EU rules on medicinal products and not by those relating to organic production and labelling of organic products. It is true that certain optional information may be included on the packaging of medicinal products, on the condition that it is useful to the patient and is not of a promotional nature. 

However, information relating to the organic production of the active substances of traditional herbal medicinal products does not satisfy that condition. Indeed, since such medicinal products can be purchased without a prescription, that information could directly lead to a decision to purchase on the part of the patient, without that information necessarily having any value as regards health. 

That being said, the competent authority may, in the context of a marketing authorisation procedure, find that active substances with therapeutic or preventive properties resulting from organic production have a beneficial effect on the therapeutic characteristics of a medicinal product. In such a case, the authority may approve such a statement on the packaging of the medicinal product. (source curia.europa.eu/photo freepik.com)

Read the decision here

_____________

1 Within the meaning of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. 

2 Together with other indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ombudsman inquiry on Commission President’s text messages is a wake-up call for EU

An overview of the regulatory framework on Gambling Services in the European Union

Access to documents: the Commission decision refusing a journalist of The New York Times access to the text messages exchanged between President von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer is annulled (CJEU)

New President of the European Court of Human Rights

Imposition of a fine on a bank in Greece for an incident of personal data breach