EU law does not preclude Member States from providing for civil proceedings for confiscation which are unrelated to a finding of a criminal offence (ECJ)
The European Court of Justice in its Judgment
in Case C-234/18[1]
ruled that EU law does not preclude Member States from providing for civil
proceedings for confiscation which are unrelated to a finding of a criminal
offence. Such proceedings are not covered by the Framework Decision on the
confiscation of property.
BP, the Chair of the supervisory board of a
Bulgarian bank was subject to criminal proceedings for having incited others,
from December 2011 to 19 June 2014, to misappropriate funds belonging to that
bank in the sum of approximately €105 million. The criminal proceedings are
pending and have not yet given rise to a final judgment. Independently of those
criminal proceedings, the Bulgarian Commission for the combatting of corruption
and for the confiscation of assets found that BP and members of his family had
acquired assets of a considerable value whose origin could not be established.
That commission therefore brought civil
proceedings before the Sofiyski gradski sad (Sofia City Court, Bulgaria) with a
view to confiscating illegally obtained assets. That court asks the Court of
Justice, in essence, whether EU law precludes legislation of a Member State
which provides that a court may order the confiscation of illegally obtained
assets without those court proceedings being subject to a finding of criminal
offence, or the conviction of the persons accused of committing such an
offence.
By this judgment, the Court holds that the
Framework Decision on the confiscation of property[2]
aims at obliging Member States to establish common minimum rules for the
confiscation of crime-related instrumentalities and proceeds, in order to facilitate
the mutual recognition of judicial confiscation decisions adopted in criminal
proceedings. It follows that that framework decision does not therefore govern
the confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds ordered in the context of or
following proceedings that do not concern the finding of one or more criminal
offences.
The Court observes that the confiscation
proceedings pending before the Sofiyski gradski sad are civil in nature and
that those proceedings coexist, in national law, with the confiscation regime
under criminal law. Those proceedings concern assets alleged to have been
illegally obtained, and they are conducted independently of any criminal
proceedings brought against the person accused of committing offences and of
any conviction of that person.
In those circumstances, the Court found
that the decision that the Sofiyski gradski sad is called upon to adopt in the
main proceedings does not fall within the context of proceedings relating to
criminal offences and therefore does not fall within the scope of Framework
Decision on the confiscation of property. The Court concludes that EU law does
not preclude national legislation which provides that a court may order the
confiscation of illegally obtained assets following proceedings which are not
subject either to a finding of a criminal offence or, a fortiori, the
conviction of the persons accused of committing such an offence.
(curia.europa.eu/ photo by pixabay)
___________________
[1] Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na
nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v BP and Others
[2] Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on
Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property (OJ 2005
L 68, p. 49)
Comments
Post a Comment