LegalPost.eu

Judgment of the Court of Justice (1.8.2025) in Case C-665/23: Payment services: the payment card user is deprived of the right to obtain a refund of an unauthorised payment transaction of which he or she has become aware if he or she delayed in notifying it to his or her provider with intent or gross negligence This is the case even if he or she notified it to the payment institution within 13 months from the debit date. A consumer holds a gold deposit account with the company Veracash SAS. In March 2017 Veracash sent him a new withdrawal and payment card. Between March and May 2017, daily withdrawals were made from that account. The consumer in question claims, however, that he never received that payment card or authorised such withdrawals.  The Regional Court, Évry, (France), followed by the Court of Appeal, Paris, (France), dismissed his request for refund on the ground that the withdrawals at issue had not been notified to Veracash ‘without undue delay’, as required by the Mon...

An Italian high school was fined by the data protection authority for using a fingerprint-based attendance system for administrative staff. The authority found the system lacked a legal basis and that employee consent was not a valid justification due to the power imbalance between employer and employee. Following a complaint, the Italian Supervisory Authority (SA) - Garante found out that a high school adopted a biometric recognition system that, in order to detect presence in office and prevent damage and vandalism, required the use of administrative staff's fingerprints. The workers involved were those who had given their consent and did not wish to use traditional methods of attesting their presence at the office. The Italian SA recalled that, according to the GDPR and the Italian Data Protection Code, the use of biometric data in the workplace requires a clear legal provision and specific guarantees for the rights of the data subjects. But the national provisions that prov...

In its judgment dated 1.8.2025 in Joined Cases C-422/23, C-455/23, C-459/23, C-486/23 and C-493/23), the Court of Justice ruled that  the double appointment of judges to the Polish Supreme Court is compatible with EU law. The Civil Chamber of the Polish Supreme Court has doubts about the independence and impartiality of the panels of three judges called upon to rule on five different appeals in cassation. In addition to a judge from the Civil Chamber, those judicial panels include two judges from the Labour and Social Insurance Chamber. The latter have been appointed to sit on the Civil Chamber for a period of three months. The unjustified and unconsented appointments of the latter judges, as well as the appointments of the panels called upon to rule on the five appeals, were decided by the First President and the President of the Civil Chamber of the Polish Supreme Court, who were allegedly appointed judges to that court under conditions incompatible with EU law. [1] The ...